Summary
Quick Links
Piracy has long been a controversial issue in the entertainment industry. Companies, likeOne Piecepublisher Shueisha,claim they lose millions (or even billions) of dollarsdue to it, thus strongly harming the industry and potentially jeopardizing new investments due to the losses.
On the other hand, advocates usually claim piracy is a tool to grant people access to culture and entertainment, as well as to preserve content that most companies are not interested in (especially old movies, series, games and so on) – butthere has been a focus on anime content.
Regardless of the basis of these claims, illegal distribution of copyrighted content is a felony in most countries today, including the US. In several of them, accessing pirated content might be considered a misdemeanor.
In the last two decades,enforcement against digital copyright infringement has grown, especially in countries that have a strong entertainment industry– because these big players usually press the government to be harsher on piracy. Third World countries (or developing countries)are also being pressured to crack down on piracy, as many pirate distributors prefer to operate in these countries due to laxer laws or loose enforcement.
In this scenario, Rep. Zoe Lofgren proposed theForeign Anti-Digital Piracy Act (FADPA)in the US Congress on June 06, 2025.
What Is the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act?
TheFADPA is an attempt to amend the American copyright law, focusing on “foreign websites” (websites hosted outside the US) primarily designed to infringe copyright – that means things like anime piracy streaming sites, manga piracy platforms and so on. Of course, the bill doesn’t focus solely on manga or anime, but could have a huge impact on it if approved.
Basically, the bill proposes a regulatory framework to allow copyright holders to petition large ISPs (Internet service providers) and DNS providers (Cloudfare, for example) to block access to pirate websites – also allowing these websites to defend themselves before the court grants or denies the request.
According toTorrentFreak, DNS providers are usually excluded from site blocking regulations. Cloudfare has been reluctant to accept blocking requests, although it has done it a few times, under court decisions.
If the bill is approved, there would be a clear order of steps until any request is granted:
It is worth noticing that FADPA allows the providers to choose how to comply with the order. The orders could also be updated if the website tries to rebrand itself to circumvent the blocking or any other legal issue (as 9anime did when it turned into AniWave before shutting down).
Lofgren’s goal was to shield non-infringing third parties (ISP, DNS providers) from any legal liability.
Major Companies Are In, But Others Are Skeptical
As stated, the bill gives (or tries to give) the operators to contest the preliminary order, andit has been praised by some for supposedly tackling digital piracy while protecting intermediaries(DNS providers, ISPs) from liability.
TheMotion Picture Association(MPA) isbacking the bill– it includes major companies like Disney, Netflix, Sony Pictures, Warner Bros., Universal Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Amazon MGM Studios and Amazon Prime Video. SAG-AFTRA, 2IM, IATSE, ITIF and The Copyright Alliance also welcome the FADPA.
However,other civil groups, like Public Knowledge and Re:Create, have criticized it, claiming it is censorship and would mostly benefit big companies, working as an “internet killswitch” for them.
Japan has also beentrying to crack down anime and manga piracyand this bill is likely to be well-received among Japanese companies if ever approved.
